Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Maruti suspends 28; plans to make 200 snap recruitments

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd, the country’s biggest car maker, plans a snap recruitment of 200 temporary workers as it tries to bring production back on track at its plant in Manesar, Haryana, in an escalation of the company’s battle with a section of the workforce.
The company also suspended 28 more workers on Tuesday for allegedly instigating the protest and disrupting output, taking the number to 49 employees.
“In the last 30 hours since production came to a halt, the company’s managers and engineers have been scouting for experienced and ITI (Industrial Training Institute) trained manpower in the Manesar belt,” the company said in a release on Tuesday. “By the end of the day, they had identified over 200 people and expressed confidence that production would be ramped up in the next few days. These 200 people are likely to join in the next two-three days on a contract basis.” The Gurgaon-based company said that the nearby Manesar plant has about 290 supervisors. In addition, around 50 diploma engineers from the Gurgaon plant are also being deputed to the Manesar site. “The entire strength of manpower may be deputed in a single shift for effective execution of production activities.”
Work resumed in Manesar on Tuesday afternoon in some areas—the weld shop, the press shop and the paint shop.
“The operations today were mostly focused in the high automation areas of the plant,” the company said.
The teams were engaged in streamlining processes and strengthening quality production systems in order to prepare for a ramp-up in the next few days, Maruti said.
The company, which makes every second car sold in India, has asked workers to sign a “good conduct bond” before it allows them to return to work.
On Monday, it suspended 10 workers, dismissed five and discontinued the services of six trainees. “This is a clear case of applying pressure tactics. But we are united and adamant on what we want,” said Sonu Gujjar, a member of the unrecognized Maruti Suzuki Employees Union. “We have been working with the company for six-seven years. How can you expect somebody from outside to come and learn the work in a day?”
Meanwhile, Communist Party of India (CPI) leader Gurudas Dasgupta, who is also the secretary general of the All India Trade Union Congress, Aituc, met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh over the situation at Maruti’s plant.
“The Prime Minister said he will ask the Haryana chief minister (Bhupinder Singh Hooda) to look into the matter. I will meet him again on Monday,” Dasgupta said. Aituc is backing the agitation.
The latest developments at the Manesar factory are a continuation of the labour unrest that started in June, when workers struck work for 13 days demanding the recognition of the Maruti Suzuki Employees Union.
The fresh protests at the Maruti factory have led to a demand for labour reforms by companies. The Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India (ACMA), an industry lobby group, said companies should be allowed to lay off permanent employees during a slowdown or issues related to inefficiency.
“We are in talks with the government for reforms in labour laws as these are necessary to make India a manufacturing hub,” said Arvind Kapur, vice-president of ACMA during an event in New Delhi. “We would like to have only permanent employees working for us. At present, we hire 50% of our workers on contractual basis because the law does not allow us to adjust our workforce in line with the fluctuations in the market.”
Kapur, who is also the managing director of Rico Auto Industries Ltd said that the region has seen violent labour protests in the past and the Maruti protest may spread, which is a concern for the entire auto belt in Gurgaon.
Kapur said that the auto component industry estimates that it needs to double its workforce over the next two years and that there is going to be a shortage of trained manpower. “Companies are investing in training programmes and when you hire from contractors the benefits of such programmes cannot be availed of as the workers keep changing,” he said.

Ministers block the National Sports Development Bill

Attempts to bring about transparency, accountability and efficiency in the functioning of the sports federations and the way the sports is run in the country received a "serious setback’’ as the Union Cabinet rejected the National Sports Development Bill 2011 at its meeting on Tuesday as Ministers "ganged up’’ to block the proposed legislation.
The Cabinet meeting, presided over by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, witnessed heated exchanges and sharp divisions as the Ministers, representing interests of cricket and some other sports federations, raised strong objections on granting approval to the Bill at the nascent stage itself.
At the outset, Dr. Singh lauded the Bill in its present form and termed it as a "good legislation". He was backed by Home Minister P. Chidambaram, who supported the move by the Sports Ministry to bring about accountability and usher in fundamental changes in the way sports federations function in the country, often behind an opaque screen.
However, the move to bulldoze the Bill in the Cabinet meeting came surprisingly from within the Congress party, and was backed by its allies in the UPA government. Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee is learnt to have told the Cabinet that Parliament would never approve this Bill in the present form or scenario.
However, the Bill faced fierce opposition from Maharashtra strongman and Agriculture Minister, Sharad Pawar and his Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) colleague Praful Patel. In the present Cabinet, three Ministers – C.P. Joshi, Vilasrao Deshmukh and Farooq Abdullah - head cricket associations in their respective States, while Mr. Pawar is the president of International Cricket Council (ICC). Mr. Patel heads the All India Football Federation.
Mr. Pawar was so furious with the presentation of the Bill in the Cabinet that he threatened to take the matter to the UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, and ensure that the Bill was not cleared. Referring to the issue of age bar of 70 years to hold office in any sports federation, Mr. Pawar is understood to have stated that if this was the criteria then nobody in this (Cabinet) room should be above 70 years of age.
He was backed by Mr. Patel, who termed the Bill as intrusive and something that would interfere with the running of the sports federations. Interestingly, they received support from none other than Union Surface Transport Minister, C.P. Joshi and Urban Development Minister, Kamal Nath.
The Minister for New and Renewable Energy, Farooq Abdullah, also took a strong exception to the introduction of the Bill, and especially to the age bar provision. "I am very young and can do all sorts of things that even youngsters cannot do. This Bill is not feasible,’’ he is learnt to have remarked.
Witnessing the acrimony over the Bill, the Prime Minister sought the opinion of the Cabinet whether the Bill should be referred to the Group of Ministers (GoM). At this instance, Mr. Chidambaram is understood to have suggested that the Sports Ministry should be asked to re-work the Bill. "Let us not throw the baby out of the basket,’’ he is understood to have commented.
At this point, the Prime Minister asked the Sports and Youth Affairs Minister, Ajay Maken to re-work the Bill and bring a proposed legislation that ensures transparency and efficient functioning of sports in the country.

All over world new update

All over world new update